Re: Backporting openrct2
Patrick Matthäi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 29.10.2022 um 21:27 schrieb Mathias Gibbens: > Hi, > > I'm planning to upload a backported version of openrct2 (along with > openrct2-objects and openrct2-title-sequences) to bullseye-backports. A > couple of weeks ago Phil Morrell (CC'ed) requested that the package be > backported, and from my hosting of unofficial backports I see roughly > 15 unique downloads when a new version is released, so I think there is > sufficient interest in having a backported version. > > The upstream openrct2 project is very active; each new release > includes many new features and bug fixes, even though the version > number is not increasing that quickly. I would expect there to be a > desire for the foreseeable future to have current versions of openrct2 > backported to the stable version of Debian. > > I am the package maintainer, and am happy to take care of the > backported version as well. It's a trivial rebuild on bullseye from the > version in testing, so it won't be much more effort on my part. I'll be > submitting a RT ticket to be added to the backports ACL. > > Thanks, > Mathias Hey, thanks for your efforts and maintaining the package also for backports! Just FYI you normaly do not have to publish a message why you are uploading a BPO in this case, just do it and everyone is happy about your work :-) If you need help on backporting or if you have got a special case sure ask the list!