Re: request to backport memtest86+
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote: > I didn't think about that. I thought new upstream releases are only > done for special packages which otherwise have no security support like > Firefox or PHP the version number of the update doesnt really matter, what counts is whether the fix is warranted and unlikely to introduce new breakage. (fixes for normal bugs are usually not warranted.) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ blockchaineinträge sind wie liebesschlösser an brückengeländern. ja, die dinger haben eine gewisse security, aber das anhängen ist ein rein symbolischer akt, ohne garantie, dass es ernst gemeint ist. was bleibt ist kitsch, dessen kosten auf die gemeinschaft abgewälzt werden. (@mspro)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmNgHP0ACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhxv9Q/+OzuH3ISaE/EXklbkDGkEss8qOpNz44wblxMSPH1ZmRrqEVYY/yQJDaa5 e7mRG5wfCp6ShGdob2FNBrrBsQqdVfb45Bzc6b/YvRbXFOpzet7ieOQciP4NVKl1 BKZvX/NV1hhzNAxsLLh+yzZ+Zezvx3SMBW+78WoV8iJXuxoeU0q5Yew7s7VjhO6k xHxVABVtn4S9gukgu9zXjDZaSMgkzgnq+N2qg8UtVNsaw0BZkQ37yPwkW0WjWdYR 2msDSD2pAhNdxJkeveTpQ5M1/ZgYlEoRpWUNCfKKvkcOKEoZuzM//n8MeuTRr+5N tVCv067Ehz/4cPxvbAqgo3o9Adg9jY42CEPAoYt7Wd2jiCusizkXU/He66Xs+nNx 0kRMuzISp3bquX0EKni8zfPk6ur8jysJjsN59P+XrVlvfotNvW/Y10EM97rgQ3g1 Jf3QHUqSHGCUFwWffsStz85GJlufT56Ncxm+Gj4ZjRg7wrC4b1dYBBHf3ZsfJEt/ usoOOgOEAaaZe7cONGDDDm4KjnZtDzh2dp5BSXkY/ta4r+wHHUPlpTszZWR+07RQ s3fiVEUBn+fxj9RSYGPE+kuKJE8S4rFQfxKVX6xTPCHu3LJxf1C4f1G795KpoQOn vKQG1bCvcuDB1IFQ/vrD2k98j59ZoD3D8l3P+FirHN13cLxhxjQ= =7Evx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----