Re: Backport request for btrfs-progs
Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Alex! Alessandro Polverini <[email protected]> writes: > Hello, > we have a backported kernel 6.x (btw, thanks!), but we miss a > corresponding btrfs-progs, is it possible to have a backport? > > Thanks in any case! > Alex I believe 6.1 is the time to resume backports of btrfs-progs, but I'll upload 6.0 now, because it will take time for it to be accepted. -progs 6.1 will migrate to testing in four days and will then become eligible for backporting. Linux-6.1 is still in experimental, and I'm not sure what its ETA is for unstable->testing->backports. In my opinion, for btrfs, that's the first version that represents an unquestionable upgrade from 5.10. Of course, hardware-enablement is something else entirely, and there's not much room for choice in this case ;) Regards, Nicholas
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 857 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJEBAEBCgAuFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAmOs26QQHHN0ZW5AZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBaiDBHX30QYUVlEACvhxMZ/c8XuQ0y8M7Z67/vSkY3BXlbpMAM Oh7YuLow5N/ICz5E46DN4zoAnfhu9+6gIrZrUZ8E5h7Sob2oG3ZMdgnt2+VJ6DAB DL1oq4YlSMkLqphHDCOHmRKJZJJFknsovLmUxma71ebzebQlrJNE2d/IgZbF8Vmy 7VUUKUI9ccbVl4vt24Z0fzOR8mh7csFRua0tGm4JQWr3zBbSjNt5eCrrqe9IAqVF KdLxV1VOqHrm9oNn05NBDTj63NL0kKunBP5QXpOP4/U0KHpSOkqpeDefmEM307N4 JezkmKiGDCmibvoiTXPJ42G6YIROy+e6hLeXg8mnW6/ABHlQODgOfDtjagoHOMJd LHCPQIJ9QxvRazSrFe+eS+BRQnZh3+yyMW1mXBf35vlubdR6LhO4q5f6pDgaBBHx Zgfg6zFyKd8TKm6do/p3fYxOKjTIyc2JcNerTh76UQ9xwRjRzH40+nOtLf/0qeZq KDB91N6NjxsSlNU6UOAYnO9NIShulpKvw4IZ8xo4PsEKBhWXyfQROYUpW5jSbAuw VFiqqUHYLtLurA7/9vGVSQP0ML76q4KIf07WoDc7+DBN/0G6pY5m+w3fPSCiWfy8 DwPqxYOu1ODpAggjGpc/h7MjMC33wzXWT0l3tj3NU5NVevL7b9+mCACQ5eS4SMOH KFXUJUpSlw== =dvYA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----