Re: Possible to get a ddclient backport on bullseye to support Cloudflare API?
"Michael A. Nunes" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALX0dxS3y0DmRTuNMmLg75FP1QJ3QpaZA5tGdZSmz4zFoyoGHQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Thank you gentleman, I really appreciate it. Have a great day! Michael On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:36 AM Sven Hoexter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2023 at 11:12:36PM -0500, Richard Hansen wrote: > > On 2023-02-02T05:58-0500, Sven Hoexter wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 05:12:27PM -0500, Michael A. Nunes wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > ddclient (https://github.com/ddclient/ddclient) has started > > > > supporting the Cloudflare API since 5/2022, however the package on > > > > bullseye is still using a version from 1/2020. Is there any chance > > > > we can get a backport of the latest official release off ddclient? > > > > > > Right now it has an open bug which is preventing migration of 3.10 to > > > testing, and thus an upload to backports. > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028849 > > > > > > Richard, do you need a sponsor for the upload or is there some other > > > reason holding you back from getting that fixed? > > > > I need a sponsor to upload 3.10.0-2. I emailed my usual sponsor a > couple of > > times over the past couple of weeks but haven't heard back. Sven, would > you > > mind uploading it for me? > > Uploaded. :) > > Michael, I'd recommend to just pick this single package from unstable > after the next push to the mirrors. Except for convenience to have it > in the backports repo, there is not really a need to have it uploaded here. > All depedencies are available in bullseye and the package is arch all. > > Sven > -- Michael A. Nunes /p at pcmike dot net