Re: Bug report: rsyslog 8.2212.0-1~bpo11+1 changes syslog date format, breaks logging to /var/log/messages
Christian Hoffmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:39 Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 15:59:13 +0000, Christian Hoffmann wrote: >> the package upgrade from rsyslog package >> version 8.2208.0-1~bpo11+1 to 8.2212.0-1~bpo11+1 has changed the date and >> time format of syslog entries > According to the changelog, that was an intentional change, switching > to the upstream default logging format (see also > <https://bugs.debian.org/475303>). > >> and there's no further logging to /var/log/messages > According to the changelog, that was an intentional change, to > close <https://bugs.debian.org/580552>. /var/log/messages was always > somewhat misleading, because it received medium-priority messages but > not high-priority messages, which seems like an odd thing to want. Making > it more comprehensive would have made it a duplicate of /var/log/syslog. > > As far as I understand backports policy, it wouldn't necessarily be > considered valid for the maintainer of a rsyslog backport to revert > those changes: we don't have a way to get backports of new upstream > versions without also getting any behaviour changes that came along > with them. > > smcv > (neither the maintainer of rsyslog nor the maintainer of its backport) Thank you very much for this context and the links, Simon. In retrospect, I think I've failed to link the term (RFC 3339) "high precision timestamps" in Michael Biebl's changelog for rsyslog 8.2210.0-3 to the changed time / date format of the syslog entries. Your comments have now made the background of that behavior clear to me. Thanks a lot Christian