Re: Bug report: rsyslog 8.2212.0-1~bpo11+1 changes syslog date format, breaks logging to /var/log/messages

Christian Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:39 Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 15:59:13 +0000, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
>> the package upgrade from rsyslog package
>> version 8.2208.0-1~bpo11+1 to 8.2212.0-1~bpo11+1 has changed the date and
>> time format of syslog entries
> According to the changelog, that was an intentional change, switching
> to the upstream default logging format (see also
> <https://bugs.debian.org/475303>).
>
>> and there's no further logging to /var/log/messages
> According to the changelog, that was an intentional change, to
> close <https://bugs.debian.org/580552>. /var/log/messages was always
> somewhat misleading, because it received medium-priority messages but
> not high-priority messages, which seems like an odd thing to want. Making
> it more comprehensive would have made it a duplicate of /var/log/syslog.
>
> As far as I understand backports policy, it wouldn't necessarily be
> considered valid for the maintainer of a rsyslog backport to revert
> those changes: we don't have a way to get backports of new upstream
> versions without also getting any behaviour changes that came along
> with them.
>
>      smcv
>      (neither the maintainer of rsyslog nor the maintainer of its backport)

Thank you very much for this context and the links, Simon. In 
retrospect, I think I've failed to link the term (RFC 3339) "high 
precision timestamps" in Michael Biebl's changelog for rsyslog 
8.2210.0-3 to the changed time / date format of the syslog entries. Your 
comments have now made the background of that behavior clear to me.

Thanks a lot

Christian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.