Re: [firmware-linux-nonfree bpo update needed] Re: Could mesa be backported?
Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 17:43 -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Sorry to bother you, because I'm sure you're busy with preparing for > bookworm. When you have a minute, would it be possible to update the > firmware-linux-nonfree bpo? [...] Right, sorry for letting it get out of date. Didier Raboud prepared an updated version for -backports at the end of 2022 and then I failed to upload it. Since then, the ath9k_htc firmware in firmware-nonfree has been replaced by free firmware built from open-ath9k-htc-firmware. In order to keep that firmware available and avoid file conflicts, I will need to upload both packages to -backports. I expect to do that during this weekend, but it may take a little longer for this to be resolved in the archive. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice - John Levine
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEErCspvTSmr92z9o8157/I7JWGEQkFAmRD3dEACgkQ57/I7JWG EQnFXQ/+LhuAoVSV+MvS7+UhQpSe4UeYG0oKX1W9WrwsHDOkQXt5ul3Kj6+gaed2 UPYCVzT88BW97eDALX0aozW5Hkgv5xb97vZc35XePBP6EXuD7yZzinuEdkf2Sb/7 Fy814H2XnopJMy/LYCq83+phJBRKrE02W5TmjLYCCKr2akk7UHV9tyPskqmU0dTN oRqF+d1kqolOLW2amZA1bojvtXRI2yIDDPvlu6G1UXYRz+8KG6zaZ1py5zxfUWw6 6LGKnTy0jVi1eDH+COB2AWdKs91/BXIXSY4SMyh8JgAXPfIT31jvhU7B+D0jgGSD LHi5DfIi8ldt8cHfTiEN2XI0D/IemX73LIjyRuh37LorPzlwlhdBxf4kqk9Twq00 zYcn2c4l+IGwIo/NaIBtphoDKfSotRytVbt3DU9MzTEwmQmhf6FYpnVhfhzNltOU kbjUJeJgsA4Y2SZRbHqMRD1A3449LdNWoPc/hxdfVd37QpVLcEUNBAck6mNgqWDA vkQkFvdIwnKsuHgk3w6/dYnZ2HeR03r9Ef6S96RsN3xgM8oUn4KgBLE4zpGH2gR2 7zHHFL2MNpI/6mEj4gHX2yo2UAPXZAyf0FelXmH6/4tbqrTh6cxi4BeBe1C/tsQj RDM7wJVe8thhvwfEGMeoni/4ut8eCNtyn2ujBtnhZFrhvdHsYJw= =vphf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----