Binary upload required, messed it up.
Alec Leamas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear list, I'm trying to maintain the opencpn package. Last release missed the freeze, so I need to get it into the bullseye-backports and bookworm-backports list. However I messed it up, missing the fact that a binary upload is required on both branches since opencpn is NEW on both. I uploaded source packages to both branches. The results are, well, interesting. For bullseye-backports my package is now in the backports NEW queue, despite that it is a source-only package. For bookworm-backports my package is basically ignored. Here I did a try to make a new binary upload instead. The first attempt was without the original source, made a new try including the source. However, I get no feedback at all (yes, this is my first experience from the release cycle...) So, some questions: - Should I make a new, binary upload for bullseye-backports? If so, should I update the release? - What is happening to my uploads to bookworm-backports? Does this branch actually exist today? It is obviously missing in a lot of places. Anyone who can shed some light on this? Cheers! --alec