Binary upload required, messed it up.

Alec Leamas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear list,

I'm trying to maintain the opencpn package. Last release missed the 
freeze, so I need to get it into the bullseye-backports and 
bookworm-backports list.

However I messed it up, missing the fact that a binary upload is 
required on both branches since opencpn is NEW on both. I uploaded 
source packages to both branches.

The results are, well, interesting. For bullseye-backports my package is 
now in the backports NEW queue, despite that it is a source-only package.

For bookworm-backports my package is basically ignored. Here I did a try 
to make a new binary upload instead. The first attempt was without the 
original source, made a new try including the source. However, I get no 
feedback at all (yes, this is my first experience from the release cycle...)

So, some questions:

- Should I make a new, binary upload for bullseye-backports? If so, 
should I update the release?

- What is happening to my uploads to bookworm-backports? Does this 
branch actually exist today? It is obviously missing in a lot of places.

Anyone who can shed some light on this?

Cheers!
--alec
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.