Re: Fwd: dar_2.7.10-2~bpo12+1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
John Goerzen <[email protected]> (2023-08-15):
> Anybody have any ideas about this one?  According to
> packages.debian.org, that version of curl is indeed in bookworm.  (Well,
> bookworm-security)

Main dak sees this:

    curl       | 7.88.1-10                  | stable                           | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
    curl       | 7.88.1-10+deb12u2          | proposed-updates                 | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

with 7.88.1-10+deb12u1, which isn't one of those two, only in
bookworm-security (so on different dak instance), and doesn't + won't
show up in proposed-updates eventually because there's already a newer
version there (via #1042848).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=bI7V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.