Re: Backport request for Lghttpd 1.69 for Bullseye
Boyuan Yang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, 在 2023-09-22星期五的 14:39 -0400,Glenn Strauss写道: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:25:26AM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 在 2023-09-21星期四的 21:00 +0300,Petri Riihikallio写道: > > > Hello, I’ll go for this again. > > > > > > I have a project with several thousand users upgrading to Bullseye (because of Java 11). They would benefit greatly from Lighttpd 1.64 or later because that is the first > > > version to log remote IP addresses to its error log for Fail2Ban. Version 1.69 is already available for Bookworm and testing. I don’t need any Lighttpd add-on packages. > > > > > > Any help is greatly appreciated. > > > > Forwarding your request to the current Debian lighttpd maintainers to see > > whether they are interested in such task. If anyone prepares a backported > > version for bullseye-backports (or bullseye-backports-sloppy), I will be > > happy to review and sponsor the upload. > > I'll be happy to put together a backport in a week or so (the first week > of October) as I am currently in the midst of preparing to release > lighttpd 1.4.72. > > Boyuan: thank you for the offer to sponsor. I'll take you up on it in > early Oct. If you're willing to sponsor bullseye-backports-sloppy, then > I'll backport 1.4.72 about a month after the 1.4.72 release, and may do > the same for buster-backports-sloppy. Thanks. You can choose between bullseye-backports and bullseye-backports-sloppy as you wish. Unfortunately buster-backports-sloppy is already closed because Debian Buster has reached End-Of-Life (EOL), and Buster LTS is not supported by the backports infrastructure. > Petri: the lighttpd codebase is very, very portable and if you want to > test in the meantime, you should just be able to take the source from > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/ and dpkg-buildpackage on > Bullseye. While some older, lesser used modules have been deprecated > and removed, I doubt too many people are affected, so the lighttpd > package should "just work" for most people on older Debian releases. > > I recommend reviewing the upstream release notes for each lighttpd > version back to the ancient one you are running, and paying attention to > the Behavior Changes section (if present) in each of the release notes: > https://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/news > (See "Previous version:" link near top of each release notes to get > to older release notes.) > > Behavior Changes are very often low impact, such as increasing the > security of the default cipher list used by the lighttpd TLS modules. Best, Boyuan Yang
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAmUN/loACgkQwpPntGGC Ws4NERAAsIzBmNM98Ms1Gf/cop0F3gen9CI/bM6vxhqWqIHmizhCf3h02IppJ666 ksAjPIV6Q71m7BzAOugSrtzphJtA3nkfmeFhw20Xm7HHbqW+ZhIXTfZGUCEutpHj uvMYQkL4fuXMOC2jEcFTkyOgz+NiyBzePk8ULoAfGKuhaEX8VpcUZRcgyN/opDrF mqZi8rNCVoNrAye8j1bqQY97yP9ZhTcVyVQdk63jqGYCt4+Vsn5I1ea2CaH+6MvQ r/BacDNkpLAxipZccan0SoNCi4M2/mXuo+HIzGJ8ThExChC9LZ6oWoK+NjtpZcuJ J0ODkq+HeDBrx0naia7UScRCsO7xQX9lUPHj3Dm7dQ5jDOQKfIbPOID2kAN+gaU7 h/7hXFstb7urRdbbOiUu0OpmBpH1P4PXM288nxelnrdZlVAv8ECwenR7DX1uFgxs k3fCPA9CKcTbG2iRIO1u9b2Jo5R+pY44jRLu9lu4VNP93ajjNPr5fwtAwgbwoagJ w5na8/1e5RuetgkcLibvwWBmmK67eYjXvMlvD9Y62DV7i9p9wEDnsFKFp3it0UMg i3p+QdXK8nQ26Cv1WgWD+MrbVhSpSaqCFCSdLMEEh1476cIQ3DOrWq3IpEhphV3x VZYYuMhABk2abHzKg7uav+k9ivdZb0Y1XrCiJ1xMUTR8B2BqKQk= =Ixtx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----