Re: Backport request for Lghttpd 1.69 for Bullseye

Boyuan Yang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Organization Debian Project
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

在 2023-09-22星期五的 14:39 -0400,Glenn Strauss写道:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 08:25:26AM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 在 2023-09-21星期四的 21:00 +0300,Petri Riihikallio写道:
> > > Hello, I’ll go for this again.
> > > 
> > > I have a project with several thousand users upgrading to Bullseye (because of Java 11). They would benefit greatly from Lighttpd 1.64 or later because that is the first
> > > version to log remote IP addresses to its error log for Fail2Ban. Version 1.69 is already available for Bookworm and testing. I don’t need any Lighttpd add-on packages.
> > > 
> > > Any help is greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Forwarding your request to the current Debian lighttpd maintainers to see
> > whether they are interested in such task. If anyone prepares a backported
> > version for bullseye-backports (or bullseye-backports-sloppy), I will be
> > happy to review and sponsor the upload.
> 
> I'll be happy to put together a backport in a week or so (the first week
> of October) as I am currently in the midst of preparing to release
> lighttpd 1.4.72.
> 
> Boyuan: thank you for the offer to sponsor.  I'll take you up on it in
> early Oct.  If you're willing to sponsor bullseye-backports-sloppy, then
> I'll backport 1.4.72 about a month after the 1.4.72 release, and may do
> the same for buster-backports-sloppy.

Thanks. You can choose between bullseye-backports and bullseye-backports-sloppy
as you wish. Unfortunately buster-backports-sloppy is already closed because
Debian Buster has reached End-Of-Life (EOL), and Buster LTS is not supported
by the backports infrastructure.

> Petri: the lighttpd codebase is very, very portable and if you want to
> test in the meantime, you should just be able to take the source from
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lighttpd/ and dpkg-buildpackage on
> Bullseye.  While some older, lesser used modules have been deprecated
> and removed, I doubt too many people are affected, so the lighttpd
> package should "just work" for most people on older Debian releases.
> 
> I recommend reviewing the upstream release notes for each lighttpd
> version back to the ancient one you are running, and paying attention to
> the Behavior Changes section (if present) in each of the release notes:
>   https://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/lighttpd/news
> (See "Previous version:" link near top of each release notes to get
>  to older release notes.)
> 
> Behavior Changes are very often low impact, such as increasing the
> security of the default cipher list used by the lighttpd TLS modules.

Best,
Boyuan Yang
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Ixtx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.