Re: Backport request for xz-utils
Pierre-Elliott Bécue <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matt Taggart <[email protected]> wrote on 29/03/2024 at 17:14:24+0100: > On 3/29/24 04:11, Fabio Pedretti wrote: >> Hi, I'd like to request the backports of xz-utils from bookworm to bullseye. > > As long as it's the security fixed 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1 or newer. As long as we don't have a proper understanding of everything that revolves around this backdoor thing, this is not a good idea to backport xz. -- PEB
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 853 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEE5CQeth7uIW7ehIz87iFbn7jEWwsFAmYHDtwPHHBlYkBkZWJp YW4ub3JnAAoJEO4hW5+4xFsLn10P/3AuUkoQsZZV0TF9+hRqkiSJPBznWYrzhE+h u6WdLPVU/bkF7HGpbiSc/Yd2A/s2fpnNinp3F5YQoi2+CWY09XWkZWXP/RwARmQW 6ZAeACsfii6YA/6t1K4LqSMgaUXpeVnJDt9F/wGYHRSYzekQJKvQ2TyGXhp3orw0 nxilWORLcgBncCdcQwEnEeHPLmMO3V8AxgbL3oa2+46qc7tWFFBr5tmCosuBhprx yVtQ03qgCoCbN/Q/nUkBpxE9f040K9LCKjzBG1e2DG96zf2Y9Bwx8tK20xeUDPhS QicaKDXeHOCABW6vWf3RuXKTqswH6j9TW3397NqpCRclGJrt2TF6xRjtubefWutp gmL29Se/i/7IMkth9PF7jgRxiYm1J6KXX3sAt+mt2xEUpihFbkB9etKIa58gjxAH U+C5+7OUbEROS49zLsKW4BUZn6gV+fAuPDY/OLNq327wf6jinQEC7gdhoSi1lJ6o 6prMYvV03krzwi+5PysjFny1hDK1S2vUcgBptp0MMw6AtZCe9cYp6UpyCzIf/Ag7 yNyXUXpXEdymroPcHxkBZ4A/zYg13UZSyk4KNW5gb5yNoMWnNrhtPwmE4m6jli2N UGcxXa7BJAIs0ihxkg/NxZg2msLpnmVbiymJiLCmC0Qb4AGQeSekc8kJtm6tVg78 jsqI+t3f =W4Vg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----