Re: Backport request for xz-utils
Pierre-Elliott Bécue <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote on 29/03/2024 at 22:37:46+0100: > On March 29, 2024 6:55:51 PM UTC, "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>Matt Taggart <[email protected]> wrote on 29/03/2024 at 17:14:24+0100: >> >>> On 3/29/24 04:11, Fabio Pedretti wrote: >>>> Hi, I'd like to request the backports of xz-utils from bookworm to bullseye. >>> >>> As long as it's the security fixed 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1 or newer. >> >>As long as we don't have a proper understanding of everything that >>revolves around this backdoor thing, this is not a good idea to backport xz. > > The email address that purported to make the original request has a Salsa account with a private profile, which is IME not typical for Debian: > > https://salsa.debian.org/fabio-guest > > Is this person known to anyone in the project? I think not. We can ask salsa admins for hints regarding their activity. -- PEB
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 853 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJDBAEBCgAtFiEE5CQeth7uIW7ehIz87iFbn7jEWwsFAmYHTaIPHHBlYkBkZWJp YW4ub3JnAAoJEO4hW5+4xFsLplgQAKZDKbZsfxi1G/w4SK8nBhnjpfIcmYVzxauF V8RlpNqjhXaPofo47nitxv+7gMYkW0y7AnUhVLJdqz8DdPDSp93ViKha7sb4WJJg POF/xZSK9X09JLKCxEjpzIhOM8o8bYdxCRbmZdP98USULn7U2rQBjXG7w1RSfBOX n3WY5hEEdrE8bJuS2GljDUc34P6ZNSTx6MztOxgeiW8tDvC/+2zM8S2eYZfC/eR3 KSUYtYk/jYvMPrp+eQqMnACHX/ikcPWqvh6DZWKXOkGBFz6kKKuyyHopZiFI7lgQ tuXwQdhQg6nY2z1xZVq+etdxrul6soA5AofKLXET76A4uEXelVXzmfRJyUCbZGys nc6eQbF3kPqO005sYzSBpsjssbjrh5CCv3FrBT3C6fQQ2YrsjQutarHrT2IsWQVU 7HwE6tlhUdoVzCALzdw8tyueL0NZlj2MNX6EsIIxwK00Ue3Zyf3ERc2oVoO351Nr 3Iv+7M3UUPcAf8PzphCDuQy6Ti9fFLP/ctW9rxskUQKEkicolflNDaG2UZsCxgr+ B9aFO7Pe4rMfaSS11MHdrWljzXcbMHR0PZVGwDopHQ5WqWjFJRVUbWkmb7w1tEZu hP85KDFAgpcvrMCsITszo6atyhaDI0JxOrScSighlc1szsTZ4zm+7YJJw2slkB/1 Faw6bEbx =WrkA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----