Re: linux-image backports metapackage
Michael Tokarev <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
02.06.2024 01:40, Johan Kröckel wrote: > My use case is: > > Run the up-to-date backports kernel and always have the up-to-date stable kernel as fallback installed, since the backports kernel sometimes changes > drastically and is not as tested as the stable kernel. The thing is: it's nice to have the new features of the bpo kernel but in the end, I need to > work: run bpo-kernel -> nice -> upgrade with problems -> doesn't matter, reboot, stable kernel -> keep on working. So if there's an issue with bpo kernel (bpo is what you usually use), you switch back to the previously running bpo kernel which worked. Problem solved. > I don't think the "you can run only one kernel, so why have more than one installed?" argument does not hold, because I think it's good practice to > keep the last kernel installed as a fallback as well. Yes, I run only one, but I have two installed anyway, so why not four? Apt only keeps 2. /mjt