Re: 64-bit time_t transition question, and Re: Backport request for btrfs-progs
Nicholas D Steeves <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Felix, (pruned recipient list) Felix Zielcke <[email protected]> writes: > > Hi, > > I don't mind any reiserfsprogs backport. > But I can't upload it, due to backports-NEW and I'm just a DM. > > I haven't followed much developing of btrfs-convert but some time ago > it would be definitely better to just use mkfs.btrfs instead of > convert. > > Regards > Felix Thank you for such a quick reply, and sorry for the delay in mine! Have you applied for the bookworm-backports ACL yet? https://wiki.debian.org/rt.debian.org I would be happy to do the initial sponsorship if you maintain it as DM. Cheers, Nicholas
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 857 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJEBAEBCgAuFiEE4qYmHjkArtfNxmcIWogwR199EGEFAmZ8vX4QHHN0ZW5AZGVi aWFuLm9yZwAKCRBaiDBHX30QYYUZD/9CwVuxU8gEHD5dXGliH+uE40XaPugfNomQ erxuRD+xPE9A1nyziOdthh8n/so5YO4l+FtydpocUQsnkLYFgxpqCwM1unyewnJM fFS+/ddeD8sXu1oAtVN9RKknxxfbVIjYGTCE90Hk8AlsQ6VsWoc2cQIiGsJMW3yI 3UuMRZrJa/Xx1SQhoY//076hRJgMKLVez2sU/3KJuq/29fYMyJ3iwpni7triseLf C87j/G0kL94o6y46ddlvup5bvkCPxxyyK9LgGWbuIJidMPLOS7W5k/okXA+W5I2W jqKYBmzVW4K0KaXxM6PXhVx+XXjNjdAQYnqD99dc6PXTLk7F1x+FzedQdHvzyd/H ALpAz2O1Il6u4rIsApDOCkEKEkDw87vO7xOG2vkHf4TXqait90+dlNBWvvt1bZpM vqaz/SXcBA5PIqGfoTCCtKxDafyggfMZCMIJLXcNBU/YyUEHC7/7EFJCnjnqjcpI HDG0wUn1KKulG2ek3VrPNcBGC6ooxuaKds3PX3H23/ODfxQeDcOvvQC4y/EJEZlc MVsy4wrQwjv7cUJ6XQie1meXbEQaaC87eFiP2hGuJqPLvu8fvJgFaBTJzB1Ja9H/ /GcLjsNLfI/zEncevSO38etcDyOT8AZm4ONUuWKd0MvXUV/2yB2/VwwPCnFJjD+2 p67mOxsS8A== =byd4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----