Re: backport of lxc 6.0.1 to Bookworm, please ?

Mathias Gibbens <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 10:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I highly appreciate the backport of Incus to Bookworm, but I
> wonder if lxc 6.0.1-1 could be backported as well?
> 
> Regards
> Harri

  Currently I don't have any plans to backport lxc 6.0.x to bookworm.
This is largely because of packaging changes that have been made for
the 64bit time_t and /usr-merge transitions which would non-trivial to
properly unwind for bookworm while ensuring clean upgrades to trixie.

  I'm not opposed to having lxc backported, but someone else would need
to take the lead on that work; I'd be happy to review/upload if that
happens.

Mathias
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B) 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE1Bp60H32xfynSJ8cKe7i1uz0QvkFAmaD28kACgkQKe7i1uz0
QvlmYg//Uie3BEvfsd23PTs8yXdhNfmEw3C3rUUuiVLbB2BrSI60fsgWC5L0t/ko
L1eCKwAqBj95HlhKYJEQDB9kaNdw7nHF8YWox0gchzTFu9VNWLYMg19MHe2Mx8wZ
Ezu4tnCpFmaJncS+wf7rBQ1Xeco9y9oeJnf8MaCfNsmWNJJYgGBSRs9QNJRjEUrn
jS8z8HhTnDWIHukXB1aoBFoA+lU5XTMA64TJNAmvoB2bx1xDQUVbBQAEaMXbpTl0
It0j1cBFZtp9jilhkbe2ikopztSfcDSE9YxFiYDR5+JqKusNjXGSkwTTiZv3GIri
whvjlLD9qJF7TgCmTVm3PQNRIWYEONiYGNwloA6PbQxMpoZaHCt8ncLv+zUueTvw
TJwd8bI0ojUloPBGdO2U2+k0dP4PuRKCaliPEsVu7ehha6Jgd0y8RfSjHAolnL0e
UN1pvw0BJDBqKp+o8Ass1OkNqD/0dJgHo8/927p6Ny7JO0e1H4De+J/sHGfBI6Kn
ufX8SV1fLBW0KOtwXmseKiFxfBtpfOK0yGH8VWee4Xo2dw/F5Mo7DINsfASZLG7c
O5e3ghIImcpDdJbdDiOHstX4fNEW/opoDQySY2aXFc14gDhY0xeOmukgYYYCdy0y
duxoaqNR33TtP3ZhvzK67EcKVFdPC6ESp1RFxz52orIIAR5teS8=
=UV3p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.