Re: samba-libs package in bookworm-backports has version dependency errors
Paul Gevers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi all, On 07-09-2024 06:56, Michael Tokarev wrote: > I know nothing about sssd and > don't use it in any way, so have no idea even how to verify if it > works or not. Just for info and highlighting the service [0] once again: sssd has an autopkgtest and already for several years autopkgtest runs for backports are automatically scheduled on amd64 and arm64 [1]. In this case samba triggered sssd runs [2], and it shows the issue in the logs. (Unfortunately the fallback in autopkgtest to try and work around installability issues installed the wrong version of samba-libs and hence the test passed, but we hope to improve that fallback soonish to avoid removing the apt pin for the package under test). Paul PS: is anybody ever using that service? [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports/2021/09/msg00008.html [1] https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_backports-stable.html [2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/s/sssd/stable/amd64/ search for samba/2:4.20.4+dfsg-1~bpo12+1
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 495 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEWLZtSHNr6TsFLeZynFyZ6wW9dQoFAmbb5HEFAwAAAAAACgkQnFyZ6wW9dQoE +Qf8DCmrZFEV/OZE6O802gjbF8DGk6c2Jmvn+QSB5C3qfpFLBCxDqVKJK0PbTj9Dvy84GiitquVY RefLuT2ctNlnShStrcnMQw0MdfzffXWq7cJx0IBOivoHKVeP1AY21hyqzFeeh9HhBT9zk+dt8cLn QTSHMq+4n7Vcmino6jVi2ds1szdCKEjggHeCEdxkPsu/HjrWZG/OdBDQaBUDnPYAtrWHAgP6lWf+ csbk2LkdqnuQEk1Y7gmnmlzR3Qg5OneINOzuE96JSmmMOLx0FUIJhSIgLJlrU3WJnI/1A77NAY3k WTlZ+LrW32uxQTYxVzUbLryGpQgOLmhN2KRdHrF+4g== =Blqq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----