Re: nxt-firmware backport uploaded

Nicolas Schodet <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Paul,

* Paul Gevers <[email protected]> [2024-10-20 08:27]:
> > The version included in bookworm has a problem which makes it interpret
> > user program differently than the original firmware. This has been
> > reported by a Debian user, Andreas Weber, in bug #1065665.
> Have you considered fixing that problem in bookworm? If you have, why
> did you decided against it? If not, fixing bugs in a stable release is
> a great way to support all users, not only those that know and use
> backports. Backports isn't meant as a way to fix bugs in stable
> releases.

In my understanding, only the most important bug fixes could be uploaded
to stable, citing developers-reference:

> - The bug should be of severity "important" or higher.
> - Fixes must be minimal and relevant and include a sufficiently
>   detailed changelog entry.

Now the bug is actually of severity "important"… but the fix is not
minimal.

I think I could backport the fix to the stable version, I am open to
suggestions, I am still new here.

Thanks.

Nicolas.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRVkfYAa6555GfqiBzkuvtx6VwuTgUCZxVZ1AAKCRDkuvtx6Vwu
TlTuAP41JITcFyyMa4Us2XiV41Y+caV5OHEJcJH6ZJOrVBcLpQEAqihhlW0JX9ey
Avj34lbuv1/CBoTrcx/NzuuPYmwdfg0=
=8fQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.