Re: nxt-firmware backport uploaded
Nicolas Schodet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Paul, * Paul Gevers <[email protected]> [2024-10-20 08:27]: > > The version included in bookworm has a problem which makes it interpret > > user program differently than the original firmware. This has been > > reported by a Debian user, Andreas Weber, in bug #1065665. > Have you considered fixing that problem in bookworm? If you have, why > did you decided against it? If not, fixing bugs in a stable release is > a great way to support all users, not only those that know and use > backports. Backports isn't meant as a way to fix bugs in stable > releases. In my understanding, only the most important bug fixes could be uploaded to stable, citing developers-reference: > - The bug should be of severity "important" or higher. > - Fixes must be minimal and relevant and include a sufficiently > detailed changelog entry. Now the bug is actually of severity "important"… but the fix is not minimal. I think I could backport the fix to the stable version, I am open to suggestions, I am still new here. Thanks. Nicolas.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRVkfYAa6555GfqiBzkuvtx6VwuTgUCZxVZ1AAKCRDkuvtx6Vwu TlTuAP41JITcFyyMa4Us2XiV41Y+caV5OHEJcJH6ZJOrVBcLpQEAqihhlW0JX9ey Avj34lbuv1/CBoTrcx/NzuuPYmwdfg0= =8fQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----