Re: backporting sosreport
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <2753960.JA9iFHeyMN@soren-desktop> |
Arif, On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 9:02:11 AM MST Arif Ali wrote: > Now, I've not had a request to backport sosreport but, I think it makes > sense as multiple new plugins have been added since 4.0 that can be now > used to grab any diagnostic data. Makes sense. > The only issues I found while going through the sbuild locally was the > lintian issues that I have resolved in the repo, and one main one with the > man pages with spaces. Seems like bullseye did not support that. Yes. Typically you don’t worry about minor lintian issues in a backport that don’t manifest in testing, as you want the backport to be as close to testing as possible. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmdGBRcACgkQwufLJ66w tgNWUA//bw1BEYm0kFvr2flFkf3vJH/Mzg2zrj+S05ejThHAnxLNYvHohnIwSiPF 3EBvp7RqpHk5PeD0UF2/8Osu7pDhmIuVzRKUCR644Ml6hisF0BCA2h6QJ0PdnOgu GlFB/MbPEdnqaa/ODIfGqCEDf1zc2HDiPkzm7tg8ZMAJ7B1LGngCjn1rpIsrE8uY N+ejBfVKDMK33nx/MjTM794N/In7ZuzOxHqs81hJsAUDhfD00fCM5RwLrL07zkQl Y3daKl6EqWzDtk+fvpgDHYTWyL7d+XjupgPk5/LgRRcmAAbpqN5F8r+VidRb8gZo BinoK6Bw+fYdEydJ54Z+pCnqx3PoGmlLc0M2NcvwAyjshIsCCh0ghpFb+sDOAiI9 5N9xkJKpPjJrQsUv5nvQH0EmKlJzk9P1VOw3QnDiNRQP6/PyjjIL0BL3bXiKGKEU e/10nck97UCjfMSBvwTyXL0Y8mvoWhYj86dF0kP598eb6n27ZaLl6KYEqbT95ujA l8RPW/gHtStUPEhLu0oTAAmZFzmAT3Px2IEgfCn4hpqKDvPjp9fHQn+t4U4sA64l mnXE5pO3CeJwfVhDUsWY/q/QZUSCRT/UfSyP2kwHcoNygwkLsTcR+78rZhT8Cign wlmbOE7zDvU0HFElwMyrjdAmMMU2JoLaym6PKJA/v92xHzhy5dM= =C8rn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----