Re: wesnoth-1.18_1.18.3-1~bpo12+1_source.changes REJECTED

Hi Vincent,

I have no clue about why these rejects happened and consider them unexpected as well. I'd appreciate a dak expert to comment here.

Would you mind uploading the package somewhere else so that there is some sample input data for use by a debug install of dak available?

Cheers,
Micha

Am 29. November 2024 02:00:32 MEZ schrieb Vincent Cheng <[email protected]>:
>On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:49 PM Debian FTP Masters
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
>>
>> Mapping bookworm-backports to stable-backports.
>> binary:wesnoth is NEW.
>> binary:wesnoth-core is NEW.
>> binary:wesnoth-music is NEW.
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
>> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
>> concerns.
>>
>
>Looping in debian-backports this time.
>
>I tried uploading wesnoth-1.18 to backports a week ago [1] but it was
>rejected for the same reason as now. I still do not understand why
>wesnoth-1.18 is landing in backports-NEW; this upload does not
>introduce any new binary packages and it was previously uploaded
>successfully to bookwork-backports as a source-only upload [2][3]. Can
>someone on either the ftpmaster or backports team chime in? Thanks!
>
>Regards,
>Vincent
>
>[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-games/2024/11/msg00004.html
>[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-backports-changes/2024/07/msg00016.html
>[3] https://packages.debian.org/source/bookworm-backports/wesnoth-1.18
>