Re: bootstrap-html_5.3.3+dfsg-1~bpo12+2_multi.changes REJECTED

Philip Hands <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Dec 2024 12:58:26 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

[ resent with real list address this time ]

Micha Lenk <[email protected]> writes:

> It's not clear why a backport is sensible for this arch:all package.
> What is the intended usecase? What is the userbase?
> What is blocked if there was no backport?
>
> Please, let's discuss on [email protected] first.

Ah, sorry, I guess I should have put the reasoning somewhere (in the
changelog?)

The reason for this backport is that recent versions of openqa depend
upon bootstrap 5.3.3, and I would like to upgrade the backport of openqa
(which is already in bookworm-backports) when I upgrade the version of
openqa in trixie.

BTW The openqa upload that needs this is currently waiting on a couple of
node packages that are in the NEW queue (node-ace-code & node-anser)
that will need to be in the archive before I can update openqa, which
now depends upon them.

I'll be wanting to backport those node packages too, once they've got
through NEW.

Cheers, Phil.
-- 
Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832 B)