Re: bootstrap-html_5.3.3+dfsg-1~bpo12+2_multi.changes REJECTED

Micha Lenk <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Dec 2024 18:57:26 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Philip,

On 28.12.24 13:09, Micha Lenk wrote:
>
> On 28.12.24 12:58, Philip Hands wrote:
>> The reason for this backport is that recent versions of openqa depend
>> upon bootstrap 5.3.3, and I would like to upgrade the backport of openqa
>> (which is already in bookworm-backports) when I upgrade the version of
>> openqa in trixie.
>
> Ah, thanks for sharing your plan. Please re-upload. 

I just realized that bootstrap 5.2.3 is already present in bookworm. 
Does openqa really need the 5.3.3 version of bootstrap, or does it work 
with 5.2.3 from bookworm too?

The version of openqa in sid doesn't declare a versioned dependency on 
bootstrap. So, in its current version in Debian, the bootstrap version 
available in bookworm seems to be good enough for building it.

Is it maybe a bit too early to request a backport of bootstrap-html? 
Would you mind to bring the full updated openqa stack to trixie before 
you backport its individual dependencies to bookworm-backports?

Kind regards,
Micha