Re: bootstrap-html_5.3.3+dfsg-1~bpo12+2_multi.changes REJECTED

Hi Philip,

On 28.12.24 21:21, Philip Hands wrote:
> Micha Lenk <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 28.12.24 13:09, Micha Lenk wrote:
>>> On 28.12.24 12:58, Philip Hands wrote:
>>>> The reason for this backport is that recent versions of openqa depend
>>>> upon bootstrap 5.3.3, and I would like to upgrade the backport of openqa
>>>> (which is already in bookworm-backports) when I upgrade the version of
>>>> openqa in trixie.
>>>
>>> Ah, thanks for sharing your plan. Please re-upload.
>>
>> I just realized that bootstrap 5.2.3 is already present in bookworm.
>> Does openqa really need the 5.3.3 version of bootstrap, or does it work
>> with 5.2.3 from bookworm too?
> 
> No, they really depend on 5.3.3 upstream.[...]
> and attempting to build with 5.2.3 fails because some of the files
> contained in bootstrap have changed names since then, and openqa refers
> to the new (5.3.3) names.

Ok, that's a pretty strong argument for a backport. Thanks for 
elaborating it.

I've just accepted your upload of bootstrap-html. Thank you for your 
contribution.

Kind regards,
Micha