Re: Emacs 30.1 byte-compilation failures

Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Sun, 09 Mar 2025 09:25:53 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

On Sat 08 Mar 2025 at 08:20pm +01, Micha Lenk wrote:

> Both tiny changes target a situation that in practice[1] would not surface
> without using bookworm-backports. Hence I'd consider both changes even
> acceptable if uploaded to bookworm-backports directly (e.g. as a ~bpo12+2
> upload to urgently fix something). Obviously, fixing such issues via unstable
> is always the preferred and more sustainable method of fixing a backport.
> [...]
> As the only diff of your uploads are meant to have an effect in
> bookworm-backports,

Actually, the changes are primarily targeted at fixing bookworm->trixie
partial upgrades.  But they also fix the bookworm-backports situation.

> feel free to immediately upload emacs and dh-elpa as suggested.

Thanks for reviewing!  Done, with dh-elpa now in backports-NEW.

-- 
Sean Whitton
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=kPVG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----