Re: libreoffice-sdbc-firebird: Firebird error calling SUM() SQL aggregate function
Albrecht Dreß <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Oct 2025 10:46:14 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, thanks a lot for your reply! Am 18.10.25 12:05 schrieb(en) Rene Engelhard: > FWIW, you are *not* using trixies package. If you would this would have ended up in the BTS directly. > Because you used the backport it just ended up on [email protected] as per backports' policy. Ah, yes, sorry, forgot about the policy. 🙈️ But its's the same behaviour on vanilla Trixie (and derived distos, like LMDE Gigi beta, etc.), too… > and thus the bug (if it was reported against the BTS) would be important only, IMHO. So you suggest I roll back my test VM to the standard packages, and report the bug again, to ensure it is in the database? (And the bug *is* a blocker in my case, btw.!) Am 18.10.25 12:12 schrieb(en) Rene Engelhard: > Unfortunately in neither trixie nor trixie-backports nor even in untable it is > really fixable now - only when upstream finally upgrades to 4.0 or 5.0 (which > isn't even in Debian, so no system-one possible either) - because of exactly > the "downgrade" issue you mentioned in your report... I think we have two issues here: (1) Calling a legitimate SQL function must not result in an error and (2) the lack of platform interoperability. Whilst (2) isn't nice, it is *not* a blocker for me. But (1) IMHO probably *can* be fixed unless Firebird 4 is completely broken (or not ISO/IEC 9075 compatible any more, which is rather unlikely) or the glue layer is beyond your control. The issue occurred on a friend's (roofer, no computer expert) box who used “XRechnung” (<https://www.familiegrosskopf.de/robert/index.php?&Inhalt=xrechnung>, building upon the experimental embedded FB feature, but that's beyond our control) for his business for some time happily on a Win 10 box. Due to the expired support of the latter, I migrated his machine to Debian. So I guess unless (1) is fixed, the only option is to throw away the broken (from the user's pov) Debian packages, and to install those from libreoffice.org, right? I must admit that this is really disappointing for a disto which aims at being the most “stable”, to be honest. Thanks anyway, Albrecht.
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 488 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEcCEPemLFTtyGf4zATKlvDmfn2fgFAmjzb+4ACgkQTKlvDmfn 2fikuggAui57Y3nGZSJxpUSpX2ZxT3vE9QnLooA9FS/RYRoRAbgTPGXOPFl+yxlE 0KCuza+lYcPi33CQqLgf3zmhZhjkbXbfN1I5ZzA4b52kKqJXvmffEq/jWdTb0BAa nd9IyFA4Rl4+kIDCmZy0dcxD4js+fXD7cq7x+2LJL0CaziBYoqlDpQTPV5o00Hkt 0rDuItjfIvpwzVsW5HtfNgI8wlnjR2pySFpaD7hYIMuvdQDx33XNR6KgJR1FVo1d RiSfIlgjiCF/Jn06iLdq6ZbE8kOkSGHV3ROY+40eFQCR31n5QWsi1OjSUhlGgjye ISh++n2wjeHTqiccyLgFJdogdqodHQ== =4y/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----