Re: python-reportlab_4.4.7-1~bpo12+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Georges Khaznadar <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jan 2026 16:52:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Micha, is it enough that forky bear a release 4.4.7-1 to allow a backport 4.4.7-1~bpo12+1, or is it mandatory to build a backport on the base of the release of python-reportlab which belongs to trixie? Thank you in advance for your highlights about it. Best regards, Georges. Micha Lenk a écrit : > > no upgrade path to trixie (backported version 4.4.7-1~bpo12+1 >= 4.3.1-1) > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. >
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEM0CzZP9nFT+3zK6FHCgWkHE2rjkFAmlX6cEACgkQHCgWkHE2 rjlpUxAAgt0i2k0o1sQv1/L+n4JNgog02MaLRgILvR3w/JTy/p16WEbIJ08mE0B6 GE3FNsZQjmirAZ42bCWfx2pIXiaIZO83w/GOH8XIMs0EUFJWZKNIpqRDV+6dNePn oblxW4tFjiZWzfq16Dy5z8j8o1xxpgbAH/6mWYU0HIG9ZoWNxkBurUMs88Hs4W0W HGlBCvRnieQcLqHLiTisirgVHf/aPmC/56/EwyyBUcESES4RHMEebbE3wJDJBNtA pKVH6wRVpf/eN9BQiI6GlAViAVT+yLG1A7c2UOn9UubpOabzZLKznHshYEh8cp9x RKvvVDBAz+j5jkDkdLxX/wtEtoJZd/Cbvet4dDeKd0aadXi+ufGGs3Wb/vBWDEvD QIkYGU/9de77Lopm5Njn+AXpT+hZKl2K+2gPNR46TczqTEE0wrAfE3EWw8682xJp NkpQTCDHs5GIbqwQPO5uLQXuIoXoiOFDwpn2byGfB8hHLEVheJiF/ndNDlE8AW6t kNmOfi2NhUnrWbeYnIv4HwFzIB9d5fYVoIZ16yY5erpGD2VQFWMkH09xbRF5tcwU RXFLwexSqtCirMoMorUl+gjSHG6TUDpOtZHBuRsdHMqW01GaTWNqsTLnQMotD5sR 69ocSyAbUBQ67PX3d4bh9fBoKO7xQGVEV1YxAdl8aEQdzprX+OA= =sXRl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----