Re: Accepted bind9 1:9.20.20-1~bpo12 +1 (source) into oldstable-backports

Micha Lenk <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:28:56 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.backports.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hey Bernhard,

Am 2=2E M=C3=A4rz 2026 09:28:01 MEZ schrieb Bernhard Schmidt <berni@debian=
=2Eorg>:
>>  bind9 (1:9=2E20=2E20-1~bpo12+1) bookworm-backports; urgency=3D3Dmedium
>>  =2E
>>    [ Bernhard Schmidt ]
>>    * Rebuild for trixie-backports=2E
>>    * d/gbp=2Econf: set branch for bookworm-backports
>
>I seem to have aquired some severe brainrot recently=2E I accidentally
>uploaded 9=2E20=2E20 to bookworm-backports while trixie only has 9=2E20=
=2E18=2E
>I'm reasonably sure that we will update to a new upstream version in
>Trixie soonish, so the situation won't be for long, but right now I
>screwed up=2E I tried to dcut it when I noticed, but it looks like I was
>too late=2E Sorry for the mess=2E
>
>To but sugar on the icing I also wrote trixie-backports in the
>changelog, but well=2E=20
>
>I don't think I can do anything to fix this at this point?

This is a temporary situation, I understand=2E We could temporarily remove=
 it from the archive and re-upload what should have been uploaded=2E Please=
 let me know if you want me to take that action=2E

Best regards,
Micha