Re: Accepted bind9 1:9.20.20-1~bpo12 +1 (source) into oldstable-backports
Micha Lenk <[email protected]> Mon, 02 Mar 2026 13:28:56 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.backports.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hey Bernhard, Am 2=2E M=C3=A4rz 2026 09:28:01 MEZ schrieb Bernhard Schmidt <berni@debian= =2Eorg>: >> bind9 (1:9=2E20=2E20-1~bpo12+1) bookworm-backports; urgency=3D3Dmedium >> =2E >> [ Bernhard Schmidt ] >> * Rebuild for trixie-backports=2E >> * d/gbp=2Econf: set branch for bookworm-backports > >I seem to have aquired some severe brainrot recently=2E I accidentally >uploaded 9=2E20=2E20 to bookworm-backports while trixie only has 9=2E20= =2E18=2E >I'm reasonably sure that we will update to a new upstream version in >Trixie soonish, so the situation won't be for long, but right now I >screwed up=2E I tried to dcut it when I noticed, but it looks like I was >too late=2E Sorry for the mess=2E > >To but sugar on the icing I also wrote trixie-backports in the >changelog, but well=2E=20 > >I don't think I can do anything to fix this at this point? This is a temporary situation, I understand=2E We could temporarily remove= it from the archive and re-upload what should have been uploaded=2E Please= let me know if you want me to take that action=2E Best regards, Micha