Re: SE Linux training
[email protected] (Craig Small)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.consultants |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:20:36PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > them interested in paying is the hard part. > > Companies routinely spend $2000 each for a small group of their employees to > attend a training session on a new technology to determine whether it's > something that they can use. Such training sessions are run by the usual big > consulting companies who pack 20 people into a room, pay the instructor $4000 > and make a profit of $36000 - cost of facilities. For such courses the > instructor usually knows less about the topic than I do about SE Linux. I think the problem is noone knows what SE Linux does. What makes it better than just Linux? If there was sufficient interest in SE Linux then it would get easier to sell training about it. Hell, I take in those patches of yours for psmisc and procps and I'm still stumped what it does. I'd also tie it into some of the current security standards, such as it is an implementation of the "blah principle" as discussed in the XYZ security handbook. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ <[email protected]> MIEEE <[email protected]> Debian developer <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]