Re: apt-get vs Aptitude
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On Thursday 20 March 2008 08:52, Don Armstrong wrote: > Because aptitude is the recommended frontend, and resolves problems > far better than apt-get is currently able to do. It also properly > handles automatically installed packages, allows users to choose which > problem resolution they use, has a more powerfull package selection > method, can handle queuing actions, has an ncurses interface, can show > changelogs, can report bugs, can slice, can dice, can use the kitchen > sink... Does it have an emacs mode? regards, Holger
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH4qhsUHLQNqxYNSARAr4EAJ9SzLhZQa8gTp+cK/u9Jl7pvTGxdACgheyt t5TR6DtEHsIGBeTu1RvsoXc= =XnoA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----