Re: Considerations for lilo removal
Michelle Konzack <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | Tamay Dogan Network |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 2008-11-27 16:01:09, schrieb Criggie:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > BS. Both of them have their place and their uses. Slackware distros
> > don't need grub. I've seen many a distro's grub installer clobber the
> > existing grub without asking. And running a four letter command after
> > changing lilo's config is not a lot to have to deal with to keep it
> > working. Yeah, grub's great and works. So's lilo, and sometimes it's
> > the better choice under those circumstances.
>
> grub doesn't play nice with XFS
>
> http://www.shuningbian.net/2008/07/grub-xfs-debian.php
>
> lilo is the only option remaining.
I have several systems (686) where grub refuse to boot for unknown
reason and since it is a Xen machine, I have to use "kexec" after "lilo"
LILO is the only choice...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
24V Electronic Engineer
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
+49/177/9351947 50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
+33/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B) - not displayed