Fwd: RFS: skanlite

I wonder how pissed off my upstreams will be if I forward link to that
lj entry to them?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Wise <[email protected]>
Date: 2009/5/30
Subject: Re: RFS: skanlite
To: debian-mentors <[email protected]>


On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Kai Wasserbäch
<[email protected]> wrote:

> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skanlite".
>
> * Package name    : skanlite
>  Version         : 0.3-1
>  Upstream Author : Kåre Särs <[email protected]>
>                    Arseniy Lartsev <[email protected]>
> * URL             : ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.2.3/src/extragear/
> * License         : GPL2+
>  Section         : kde

Based on the perfectly completely undeniably objective criteria at the
URL below, your upstream is worthy of several points of FAIL.

http://spot.livejournal.com/308370.html

A breakdown of the points of FAIL:

== Source Control ==
* There is no documentation on how to use it for new users [ +5 points of FAIL ]
== Building From Source ==
* There is no documentation on how to build from source [ +20 points of FAIL ]
== Communication ==
* Your project does not have a website [ +50 points of FAIL]
== Documentation ==
* Your code doesn't have a changelog [+10 points of FAIL]
=== FAIL METER ===
65-90 points of FAIL: Kittens die when your code is downloaded

 Please inform them of the ways they could improve their project.

Apologies for this mail, but I just couldn't resist trying out the
FAIL criteria. I chose your RFS because it was the latest one without
a reply. Again, please accept my apologies if you don't consider this
mail the slight bit humorous.

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]




-- 
With best regards


Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич