Re: Comments on the constitution?

Steve McIntyre dijo [Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:16:19PM +0100]:
> >Humm… An idea could be:
> >
> >‣ The term is defined to be for one year, with the possibility of one
> >  automatic renewal
> >‣ If by (election date + 10 months) the DPL sends a (signed,
> >  validated, blah) message, a simple referendum is held: secret vote
> >  between a "yes" and a "no" (and... Further discussion? :-} )
> >  ‣ If the DPL seeking renewal gets a majority, his term is prolonged to
> >    a second year
> >  ‣ If the DPL does not get a majority, he can still participate in a
> >    regular election
> >‣ This mechanism can only be used once — A DPL wanting to run a third
> >  term must win a regular (full) election
> 
> /me shudders at the extra complexity, especially how it would be
> worded in the constitution. I'm tempted to say: let's just leave
> things the way they are.

Oh, just wait until we get in DEP(n+1) where we require the
Constitution to be automatically parsable as well.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]