Re: xth wrap-up about statement on diversity, statement may be issued without general resolution
Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [*] For the Constitution geeks, the quirk is that "[position]
> statements" are explicitly covered by §4.1.5, so they do not fall
> under §5.1.4 ("The Project Leader may […] make any decision for whom
> noone else has responsibility."). Also, §4.1.5 is bound by the
> procedure in §4.2, which is the usual voting procedure. I hereby
> propose this as a nice NM question for the future!
That's an excellent one for people applying for the position of Debian
Bureaucrat!
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <[email protected]>
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 490 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPkuHaAAoJEBV3C/xmFm5LbNUIAK7C3w1Gh2eeIL80+UXWYeJn U0b6FBqg0QmzSWGDqG5FYGr/k1atwEeFTXORTC6F1Qf90/ftiGy6w2QlbFHo1ZUF ixY9kkWMhAF9TDz4b7MuF4Gz3Ns9qt0X8WDb1vIeLQ73HzGv74YxgQhDxHQ1Z0cR FmcNHl6i3PmFqnx8nhRhH9K2RajJTVnnQOR0EqjJoN+kRuQimcKJpxYsab7UtEfz tOJE2DSEDen3yTAt0uJ48S2uPdLBDqC2CBo6/Im/A6JNzaOCeWim99xz8u88S3x2 zWB40NNI0tFgPxvZ5JIFddsdvEjKzE6vxxs4PfbgLT8uSLgjhBHu/t8WhNGpkA8= =L+Bm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----