Re: Bug#727708: init system discussion - the highlights

On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 06:55:45 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Chris Knadle
> 
> > I'll just mention that the proposal of switching out the default init
> > system in jessie+1 sounds a bit scary, as it will change a basic
> > administration interface in the middle of a Stable support period. 
> > Probably the most interesting scenarios with this involve servers running
> > unattended upgrades.
>
> That's not what jessie+1 means.  jessie+1 is the release after jessie.

I was indeed thinking of a point release, so I mistook jessie+1 as
"jessie + .1".  Now it makes sense, as the release after jessie is not yet 
named.

Thanks.

  -- Chris

--
Chris Knadle
[email protected]