Fwd: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
"Paul R. Tagliamonte" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAO6P2QR5YLtQp6aHNwpuc3QKEFJ4ucK2sWkEG0drBpL=P1E_Cg@mail.gmail.com> |
But hopefully between the two ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ian Jackson" <[email protected]> Date: Oct 17, 2014 12:11 PM Subject: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems To: "Joey Hess" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Joey Hess writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"): > Ian Jackson wrote: > > So if there is no backsliding, this GR will not delay the jessie > > release at all. > > But, the resolution of this GR and the start of the freeze cooincide, > +-1 week. And after the freeze, the chances of backsliding being > allowed, after release team review, are minimal. So your objection to the GR is that it is a no-op ? Other people are objecting on the grounds that the sky would fall. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]