Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Matthias Urlichs dijo [Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:10:10AM +0200]: > > Well, at least I've found yet another reason to perfer to not vote on > > this GR: It's too darn complicated to understand the procedural hacking > > that's going on. > > > Well, vote them below FD then. > > Except for the nice two-paragraph "we don't need no stinkin' GR" amendment > that's going to be one of the options, of course ;-) Maybe, *maybe* if Further Discussion does not win this GR, we can finally stop discussing systemd's evil plan for world domination? Maybe we should introduce an option called "NO further discussion"?
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUSThmAAoJEGc6A+TB25IfIQoP/jSSIyFIk+BFEEUxrd+u9CI9 /0z2mnxtNsxu2tMPfm2neFyDFT6CP3AJBReiBmoEAv9gXNqZ4RkSB488YqKzMqUP ORcg5uNK5rqP/InFDF3k7nPROSFikcoaSGGB6fDOigL4Mg1NCUek2v+JHgjzLtiC 3gyLyNWnvdfHWtOMUU2Dtc4IBnS1xrcnW7PoL1pkEYELoE0+I16yy/jwJlDrBsPj OLUcaZiae4zdxTrYPNSJEI7aefKvmUrNCyh4ElUxfqdUbNyYDkviH5aqhN8VWMQW yDS0UxkfOtP58A0ImUzVeT/9f8Qy6CrUXE3Uq+vqzPXNjiPZwFMrGRzwieYrTsSL Pr/Odmc5LbBzilZo9MJUNg8dnb8oxqIhnH/TdKfKwyW3b1dPyUl5/7yYoqFW/Fz3 x6rAQ1Z8nZ3/vzLzDokBRbtRvxmiefDg3Av6WO7OabsM+owB1HsiXCf0pqKBq5jZ uV7L1klbjw9SrlNymqGXhH59/X8l5Q1+zaUGRB8RVgiaBy2rMIJP6SlOSOVmzUEK lKOi8Lavp/1xiVertbWZSEMi3f4PaLAHC3njPw+zaOULEBf+iTIFhRdppvebycA0 wEEnf0W0KSGfgk+OcE3uwyKFBeZfCX7bt6yjjF6byxp/OPbfZt6+5oMWyt6xfA6Z WcxN5OE8oHk9/QJfSgab =UoSF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----