Re: mpich vs. openmpi

Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf
Organization Debian GNU/Linux
Message-ID <1193155477.23900.45.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:35 +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 of October 2007 04:22:08 Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Because my packages petsc, hypre, parmetis are moving to OpenMPI, I no
> > longer use, nor have a strong motivation for improving, my package
> > mpich.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> as a long-time user of mpich I'm interested how does openmpi compare to 
> mpich2. Are there any particular reason why to prefer one over the other? Are 
> there any compatibility issues when switching from mpich2 to openmpi? I tried 
> to search web but haven't found anything useful.

Hi,

AIUI, OpenMPI has fault tolerance features which are not in the MPI-2
spec, and not in the mpich2 plans.  I haven't looked into this in
detail, as I don't have large enough clusters for this to be a major
issue.  But that was a major reason for me to migrate PETSc.

[Anyone else?]

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Engineering consulting with open source tools
http://www.opennovation.com/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.