Re: mpich vs. openmpi
Adam C Powell IV <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian GNU/Linux |
| Message-ID | <1193155477.23900.45.camel@localhost> |
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 11:35 +0200, Pavel Jurus wrote: > On Tuesday 23 of October 2007 04:22:08 Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Because my packages petsc, hypre, parmetis are moving to OpenMPI, I no > > longer use, nor have a strong motivation for improving, my package > > mpich. > > Hello, > > as a long-time user of mpich I'm interested how does openmpi compare to > mpich2. Are there any particular reason why to prefer one over the other? Are > there any compatibility issues when switching from mpich2 to openmpi? I tried > to search web but haven't found anything useful. Hi, AIUI, OpenMPI has fault tolerance features which are not in the MPI-2 spec, and not in the mpich2 plans. I haven't looked into this in detail, as I don't have large enough clusters for this to be a major issue. But that was a major reason for me to migrate PETSc. [Anyone else?] -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/