Re: building package with different libs

Manuel Prinz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.beowulf,gmane.linux.debian.science
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Mittwoch, den 19.11.2008, 04:32 -0600 schrieb Steve M. Robbins:
> If I may, I'd like to suggest mpi-defaults go ahead despite
> good intentions that OpenMPI be ready before squeeze.  
> 
> That way, maintainers of MPI-using packages (e.g. me) don't have to
> deal with the mess from today until the day OpenMPI becomes the
> defacto default.  If that day arrives before squeeze: no problem,
> mpi-defaults can just disappear.  

Sure, this is a valid point. Adam, can you please upload the package
then? Is it available for review somewhere?

> In the meanwhile, it serves a need.  To answer Manuel Prinz's
> question: *my* goal is only to build mpi-using packages with some
> default MPI, not with all flavours of MPI. 

If that is the use case, then the package will be all you need to stop
the headaches, true.

Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkkj/iwACgkQ8WlhyMyNeVc6bwCfeoa3gGqGP9zSSOQ/HQ4QwDAF
WEUAn0+4SyNB/IRTX1P4iuwzys1zbf0H
=3dQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.