Bug#433568: VLAN support within D-I
Colin Watson <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:57:19 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ams8H5tdro_NPr-d__11507.5858820759$1785412767$gmane$org@riva.ucam.org> |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 01:41:41PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Colin Watson <[email protected]> (2026-07-30): >> After a fair bit of local testing, I've applied this patch to netcfg master, >> with several additional changes of my own, and uploaded them as part of >> netcfg 1.204. For transparency I've kept my own changes as separate git >> commits, and you can see them all here along with my rebased version of >> Tyler's patch: […] > >Thanks for picking up that topic. I'm sorry it's never managed to get near >the top of my todo list in so many years… I think I remember somebody (maybe Martin?) asking me about this at DebConf 14 in Portland ... >> Once this reaches daily builds >> (https://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/), I'd very much appreciate >> testing by others in live environments that use VLANs to confirm that I >> didn't break anything. I don't use them routinely myself; I set up a test >> environment so that I could connect a test laptop to a trunk port, but >> there's always the possibility that I made mistakes in both the patch and my >> test environment that cancelled each other out. > >I think the “test laptop” bit increases the chance my hunch in #1143094 >might be correct: you wouldn't have gotten a short name like ens3 there, >but something long-ish like enx00e04c680be4 or enx2e7cf2e89a52, hiding >the alignment/padding issue? enp0s25 in my case, but yes, since it seems that the kernel uses %6s here, that's long enough to hide the issue. Will fix, thanks!