Bug#1143565: Debian should default to XFS
Jose R Rodriguez <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:57:59 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot |
|---|---|
| Organization | Metztli IT |
| Message-ID | <ad621e3a832b336997e7922bbc5a7493__35690.6584509247$1785852328$gmane$org@metztli.com> |
On 2026-08-04 05:50, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 04/08/2026 at 12:57, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: >> >> That's certainly a valid point. I take this to mean that you think we >> should have technical arguments for one or another default, as opposed >> to picking something just because someone else does it. > > XFS cannot be shrunk. IMO this disqualifies it as default filesystem. ...er, Some of us do not like the boiler-plate defaults carried over by the (lazy ?) hosting providers when they provision a bare metal and/or virtualized/cloud servers instance(s). Reiser4, likewise, cannot be shrunk. Yet, I have made it the default file system in my later customized d-i, i.e., partman-base hack: < https://metztli.it/trixie/partman-base_reiser4-default.png > And, previously, I did override the Debian default ext/x/y file system in provisioned servers by uploading my custom reiser4 image -- either to be used in virtual CD/DVD ROM device and/or booting from the d-i image residing in either of a two (at least) disk storage media in bare metal instances, and repartitioning/reinstalling Debian on reiser4: < https://metztli.blog/nochtli/boot-metztli-reiser4-netboot-on > > I have seen so many users need to shrink a partition in order to free > disk space for another partition. With XFS their only option would be > to reinstall and/or back up and restore. > > Also ISTR that XFS is more memory-hungry than ext4, and read about some > operations which caused transient high memory usage. But maybe this is > not relevant any more with current memory sizes ? > > Maybe the default filesystem could be made conditional to the > architecture, memory size, partition size... ? And whether user selected d-i Expert Installation option [?] then XFS should be the default. After all, users who subsequently resize their partitions likely are novices who have not planned their partitioning and likely would not appreciate XFS/Reiser4, either. > > Note: the default filesystem type can be preseeded.