Bug#1142955: libjson-webtoken-perl: FTBFS: test failures

Source: libjson-webtoken-perl
Version: 0.10-5
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs

This package fails its test suite on current sid, making it fail
to build and causing a debci regression.

⇧
  #   Failed test 'No tests run for subtest "RS512"'
  #   at t/Util.pm line 35.
  RSA.xs:1466: OpenSSL error: provider signature failure at /build/libjson-webtoken-perl-XtUfmQ/libjson-webtoken-perl-0.10/blib/lib/JSON/WebToken/Crypt/RSA.pm line 22.
[...]
  #   Failed test at t/spec/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08-A2.rsa_sha256.t line 109.
  #          got: '<92>Sv^E_<FA>Au<D1>;U=<89>"X<80>^G<FD><F7>Y3(#<E1><BE>^D<E7><83>Q<B0><8A><E3>9ͮ<88>^N+<FB>W<8D><DF>Eg<FB>^A^S^\<AC>Ə<B3>V<9A><CA>C<FF>Z^G<A0>2^E^R<8D><BF>օ
  <BD>e%^_^C<F4><9C><C2><D7><E1>R1 4^B<CF>^N_IZ<E8><84>^A <A9>�G<CD>=^\SF+<E8><DB>^T|<FC><EF><A7>^S<88>f<F1>#<9F><A1><EC>
  <89>x<95><CE>{<98><C6>c <E2>|p<C0><AA><E1>^BPw<FC>^C<C1>j<8E>M<B4>"<A1><E0>E<C5>b<81>1@^Do^_^O<E1>^]<90>�<92><BA>\-<BF><B2><D9>^X(=<AB><ED>^^<AD><A2><83><E9><8D><DC>^W]<FE>~<B8><BD><E1>^^ȿ<F0><D9>^WA<B8><B8><A2>^\<AD>Wt賷<ED>^V^O<EB>4<E8>Tz<F3>s<8D>f<F9>۵O<FD>*<D0>^_B<EE>a<B8>ќ<B6>-<B6>H/^F<84><DC><E7><D9>^D<9B><B8><BF><F1>^PyB<DF>~^K'
  #     expected: 'p.!<89>C<E8><8F><D1>^^<B5><D8>-<BF>xE<F3>A^F<AE>ESC<81><FF><F7>s^Q^V<AD><D1>q}<83>emB
  # <FD><<96><EE><DD>s<A2>f>Qfh{^@^K<87>"n^A<87><ED>^Ps<F9>E傭<FC><EF>^V<D8>Zy<8E><E8><C6>m<DB>=<B8><97>[^WД^B<BE><ED><D5><D9><D9>p^G^P<8D><B2><81>`<D5><F8>^D^L<A7>DWb<B8>^_
  <BE>^?<F9><D9>.
  # <E7>o$<F2>[3<BB><E6><F4>J<E6>^^<B1>^D
  # <CB> ^DM><F9>^R<8E><D4>^A0y[Խ;A<EE><CA><D0>f<AB>e^Y<81><FD><E4><8D><F7>^?7-Ë<9F><AF><DD>;ﱋ]<A3><CC><.<B0>/<9E>:A<D6>^Rʭ^U<91>^Rs<A0>_#<B9><E8>8�<84><9D>i<84>)<EF>Z^^<88>y
  <82>6<C3><D4>^N`E"<A5>D<C8><F2>zz-<B8>^Fc<D1>l<F7><CA><EA>V<DE>@\<B2>!ZE<B2><C2>Uf<B5>Z<C1><A7>H<A0>p<DF>ȣ*F<95>C<D0>^Y<EE><FB>G'
  
  #   Failed test at t/spec/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08-A2.rsa_sha256.t line 110.
  
  #   Failed test at t/spec/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08-A2.rsa_sha256.t line 126.
  #          got: 'eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJqb2UiLA0KICJleHAiOjEzMDA4MTkzODAsDQogImh0dHA6Ly9leGFtcGxlLmNvbS9pc19yb290Ijp0cnVlfQ.Ar6wmKVVRdkPt72UKXApHuIv-ffd4n-2nS7yXfpJk_eS0Lxv1tJR9a57z5Aofz0x7oqClL-nnH70sdMh24sf8BMWs3uWJ_YrtnsEcqMeP3L9PaxBgacKnSf2xTjZA9HkIwi9lcO_w1VE9CaEc3oeOYvhOPYGBnVs_sHh1jEq7xJ72JQzAbC6PsTBOnFHVuLewzYDw1shAi4HekxW1E4I6u8Csaca-o_YQfl9SD7P8oTvq58UMXlbGwr6q5bmVQc0HmXGsICdnxEJR7mrtyEVTlWH6j1McQ6hGUoXMGJascU3uEvXNN7_pjUXb8ui7gfB9uYs9xVbaS28x1u99zRU5A'
  #     expected: 'eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiJ9.eyJpc3MiOiJqb2UiLA0KICJleHAiOjEzMDA4MTkzODAsDQogImh0dHA6Ly9leGFtcGxlLmNvbS9pc19yb290Ijp0cnVlfQ.cC4hiUPoj9Eetdgtv3hF80EGrhuB__dzERat0XF9g2VtQgr9PJbu3XOiZj5RZmh7AAuHIm4Bh-0Qc_lF5YKt_O8W2Fp5jujGbds9uJdbF9CUAr7t1dnZcAcQjbKBYNX4BAynRFdiuB--f_nZLgrnbyTyWzO75vRK5h6xBArLIARNPvkSjtQBMHlb1L07Qe7K0GarZRmB_eSN9383LcOLn6_dO--xi12jzDwusC-eOkHWEsqtFZESc6BfI7noOPqvhJ1phCnvWh6IeYI2w9QOYEUipUTI8np6LbgGY9Fs98rqVt5AXLIhWkWywlVmtVrBp0igcN_IoypGlUPQGe77Rw'
  # Looks like you failed 3 tests of 4.
[...]
  Test Summary Report
  -------------------
  t/02_rsa.t                                                   (Wstat: 512 (exited 2) Tests: 3 Failed: 1)
    Failed test:  3
    Non-zero exit status: 2
    Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
  t/spec/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-signature-08-A2.rsa_sha256.t (Wstat: 768 (exited 3) Tests: 4 Failed: 3)
    Failed tests:  1-3
    Non-zero exit status: 3
  Files=9, Tests=36,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr  0.01 sys +  0.47 cusr  0.14 csys =  0.66 CPU)
  Result: FAIL

This presumably regressed with the libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl 0.35 ->
0.41 update, so the real bug may well be on that side. Feel free to
reassign as needed of course.