Bug#1138824: [Debichem-devel] Bug#1138824: nmu: coot_1.1.18+dfsg-5

Michael Banck <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 09:37:26AM +0200, Michael Banck via Debichem-devel wrote:
> I have complained about this here:
> https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit/pull/8765#issuecomment-5114438834
> 
> But I am wondering what to do here in case upstream is not planning to
> bump their API, it has been a while and we shipped a few releases with
> the dropped/renamed(?) symbols.
> 
> I guess the options are:
> 
> 1. Hold our nose, rebuild coot as requested and add versioned deps.
> Are there any other reverse deps of librdkit1t64? I don't think so.
> 2. Bump librdkit1t64 to librdkit1d (would that work? do we need
> something like librdkit1z to sort after 1t64?).
> 3. Drop the shared libraries, because we are dealing with scientific
> software.
> 
> 
> I'll see what the rdkit guys say first.

That was fast:

|we do not guarantee ABI stability from one release to the next. One
|should assume that dependencies that link against RDKit shared libs will
|need to be rebuilt against a new RDKit release. Code changes should,
|however, generally not be required. Any time that is the case, it will
|be covered in the release notes

So I guess we should go with option 3 above?


Michael
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.