Bug#1140901: src:schism: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on ppc64el

Timothy Allen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc
Message-ID <am389hATK_d_oEAt__14383.6239398055$1785595036$gmane$org@thristian.org>
Hey, maintainers, thanks for maintaining this package in Debian.

I think this issue might have fallen through the cracks? So far as I can
tell, clicking around Debian's package tracker, the timeline looks like
this:

2026-05-27: Debian's schism package is updated to the newest upstream
version, 20260524.

2026-05-28 (one day later): The person packaging schism for Fedora
reports the PowerPC build failure to upstream, at:
https://github.com/schismtracker/schismtracker/issues/828

2026-06-28 (a month and a day later): This bug is filed, since Debian
hit the same FTBFS-on-ppc64el problem with version 20260524 that Fedora
hit.

2026-06-28 (still a month and a day later): This bug is marked as "fixed
in versions schism/2:20260524-1" (i.e. the version where the FTBFS was
detected) and "done".

2026-07-03 (a month and a bit later): Upstream commits a change titled
"util: fix build on ppc64" targeting big-endian PowerPC, although they
hope it will fix little-endian PowerPC too:
https://github.com/schismtracker/schismtracker/commit/5509849f2b7

2026-07-27 (two months later): The schism package is removed from
testing, due to the continued failure to build on ppc64el.

schism may not be the most popular package, but I think it would be a
shame for it to fall out of Debian if cherry-picking the upstream patch
would fix it.


Timothy Allen.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.