Bug#1128206: cardo: no source available
"Timothy N. Gaskell" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 18:39:09 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.rc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20260804183909.16c76f65__41128.1888069183$1785886876$gmane$org@gmail.com> |
On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:49:19 +0200 Bastian Germann <[email protected]> wrote: > I have contacted the font author at his listed address but it is no > longer in service. So I am asking for removal. > > It's a pity you were unable to reach David Perry using what I assume was the email on his website, since this seems like something that could easily be remedied with modest attention. I believe he retired from his job as a Latin teacher all the way back in 2015, so he has every reason to be retired from email as well. Google Fonts does have source files for Cardo at https://github.com/googlefonts/CardoFont (sfm files that have been converted to glyphs files as well), but they do not 100% match the author's latest version at https://scholarsfonts.net/cardofnt.html Metadata from Google's version: <fontRevision value="1.0451"/> <created value="Mon Oct 24 05:35:45 2005"/> <modified value="Sun Sep 4 18:15:57 2011"/> Metadata from Perry's version: <fontRevision value="1.045"/> <created value="Mon Oct 24 05:35:45 2005"/> <modified value="Wed Apr 20 10:46:36 2011"/> There is a good chance Google's source files were created *from* the original TTF files in order to optimize for web. I suppose that means we are in the silly situation where, if someone were to rename the font to something like CMaximus and use those files to create a version with Google's and Debian's patches, we would say we had files in the preferred form for modification, but if the goal is to *not* modify the font and keep the original well-known name, then this is problematic because we do not have files in the preferred form for modification. Regards, Timothy Gaskell