Re: Bug#1030009: www.debian.org: addition of non-free-firmware for bookworm and higher
Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
cc += debian-cd Holger Wansing <[email protected]> (2023-02-11): > I have already updated several of files you listed (those which changings > were most likely non-debatable), but now I would like to discuss, what to > do with files like > > releases/bullseye/debian-installer/index.wml > releases/bullseye/errata.wml > releases/buster/debian-installer/index.wml > releases/buster/errata.wml > > Those old release pages have a warning hint like > <quote> > If any of the hardware in your system requires non-free firmware to be > loaded with the device driver, you can use one of the tarballs of common > firmware packages or download an unofficial image including these non-free > firmwares. Instructions how to use the tarballs and general information > about loading firmware during an installation can be found in the > Installation Guide. > > unofficial images with firmware included - daily builds > > unofficial images with firmware included - weekly builds > </quote> > > First I thought we can leave this completely untouched, since these > "images with firmware included" are still there and they are also still > useful (for some hardware at least), if one wants to install those old > releases. > But now I would like to propose, we change the "unofficial images with > firmware included" phrase, since they are no longer *unofficial* according > to the non-free-firmware GR. > Thus I propose to change this into "special images with firmware included" > for those old releases. > > Comments? I don't think we should change anything for buster and bullseye. We aren't going to produce official images with main and non-free-firmware, and I don't think the current implementation of those unofficial builds (using non-free) would match the spirit of the GR. Maybe people feel differently, but the guiding principle behind all the changes I've driven so far is: the official status is for bookworm and later (same story as for packages in non-free-firmware, even if that component popped up in earlier suites in the archive). Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmPn94YACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSBtqw//dTH66QeoKV9kYqOCKU9fHqa/NZ/jzb6EZCSuOq2XQQ9CPAr/hIQvnXZT zakflZUibuWuWuhsiP2I3Y2wwjU4yezYSewNTxQ4aQO+qKsnn1EjhsaDg/MQnyaW Rh/QjvH6cLHZP3hzb+OEiexpnZSbXjRc6J8okBZMdSQaGlUUIPfXxuD2pbhJCWxm /LDdZRzQ6wnI1MKXHJ9X060hDnzK0IzheEg99ThHNFfUEPmvNze/bcf5HL+SjJo4 zr6COZ78swwal9AWOkOiFuaDHi1MOxnrJLL7tHA8SjTwwiZ/StMk6WLO3u0O39DN 3xGyqzq3GFKcZqhLz+D38CPMieW15Arqa2eHROUF0gVj9wPR5fHSDo6Yj1bCPvRo tU2hQzG8Dr5xXEo6W642pjmuqKW5qv48FIx73/Pz4wr2WPrKqu1+4vjcpFqAqXlv N50SoGWSy8h5M/fj8s/vPeoV+LnkHdYL0XZijpUjLpHt0ztt7QyNZgJta9hOjYF+ Qiu0sEir1g/9LSUMdGJjbiOHP6MxAOM8og+cOqk+a6ihO/poBfTu1AgJWKomiIxZ S1a+6BDQ3iSZckgymM+AEmMx06mgUd9lnU3H8ed1Vo0YBIv4zET6FZWRY78+6F0f dxB72Zx0GR2DJlWjQtVrBnxDQzKN7pUp0Lk4nF+AJ0iyFpoYA9M= =ursW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----