Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)

Steve McIntyre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd
Organization Invalid Argument
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrew Cater wrote:
>On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 03:03:40PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> 
>> I had been thinking about doing similar for installer images too, but
>> with other work going on too I think it got too late in the cycle to
>> make that change. My plan is therefore to ship i386 installer images
>> for bookworm as normal (including bookworm point releases going
>> forwards), but to disable those builds for testing/trixie ~immediately
>> after the release.
>
>I'd honestly suggest *just* publishing DVD1 for i386.
>
>Netinst requires internet access: DVD1 can be used to install a basic
>system without this. Scrap *everything else* for i386 installation media.

We've had this discussion before. I don't see the point in removing
choice here at *really* short notice before bookworm, but still
keeping a non-zero number of installer images for the architecture. It
saves us very little effort and doesn't really gain us anything.

This is why I'm talking *now* about dropping things for trixie.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.