lvm2 udebs vs. libaio1-udeb (was: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid)

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd,gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> (2024-03-21):
> I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb
> is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of
> `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies
> would be sufficient (and might happen at some point anyway).
> 
> For the sake of consistency, I think I'm tempted to suggest a revert of
> the udeb part (it wasn't renamed so there's a contents vs. package name
> mismatch anyway).

Checking libaio's changelog (last mail got sent a little too fast,
sorry) is enlightening: this library required special attention and
wasn't just about getting rebuilt with a different package name.

  https://tracker.debian.org/news/1509816/accepted-libaio-03113-6-source-into-unstable/

Guillem is absolutely right regarding avoiding the roundtrip to NEW and
d-i's not caring, but some kind of heads-up to debian-boot@ (now cc'd)
would have been welcome.

It'd be nice if the Debian LVM Team (hello waldi) could pick it up from
here and see whether requesting a binNMU is what makes most sense here,
or if there other plans on the t64 front. A local, cowbuilder-powered
rebuild of unstable's lvm2 results in udebs referencing libaio.so.1t64
as expected (i.e. libaio1t64's shlibs).


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmX8sQgACgkQ/5FK8MKz
VSAw/BAAiAR10vIOyN5h7Q7d5+48Z86yMbn/uYsp0nM9S04DWwH+ZJKOfw9lAwPv
Cyte5eK4vuFqQb/XB5DQG7XgWbGsRGZPVI4tsEguuGF4JXy+13848lPjFmNHIB6j
aILD/n6vZkHvHdpNboqzN3k/pMIGqf6eg7VcNRZLqswsxu9F3QfUVq+q8ldW6IGG
yZPPblv1oOMbDD2u4HpDC3gUKc9w7qRoQCCsNRnVCnB6OS09zgZEAVIo7TlH0rd6
xu4kbK+HqhS26LpEcpbgcXSyIIhEq1mRt4n85M7uW3Flg4+q+ue3qa01eFpyiC5f
8McjElqIOSjkqr5bANVwiHlvksEaToA8hcwRy17TQ5YQdNjgYt8mszBY4VPgSlIp
IAmIis5eVlO/6dqDFno+PNKfocPqVcoKPYilsv6j4PuR5VfTxJiXy8qoqWhFRU0C
YHnXO+4sGbP3O9xVFcS9EsKWS2beNzCCW8ODGSYawuBRBSGp1PoqErM4b4TlVcWp
pBDFzN5QOHC/63s5wsOSa0HGL1tz6sqnP/wtXC+FKygdKs4JEHOqB1dw22tBT9hJ
8dy4y2cqPURHR61ERDXWOrLobPdBR8RbBi6srNPPCCE2z5NixvsxJyjV1zDNFSuW
Ubsf3j4PZqu/zL46vFzJfLDFX30DBY+JvYVhJqTmowgpnO/Y1x0=
=4/9I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.