lvm2 udebs vs. libaio1-udeb (was: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid)
Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd,gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> (2024-03-21): > I'm a bit conflicted about what to do here. At the moment, libaio1-udeb > is the only udeb with t64 (at least according to the output of > `apt-file search -Iudeb t64`); but a rebuild of the reverse dependencies > would be sufficient (and might happen at some point anyway). > > For the sake of consistency, I think I'm tempted to suggest a revert of > the udeb part (it wasn't renamed so there's a contents vs. package name > mismatch anyway). Checking libaio's changelog (last mail got sent a little too fast, sorry) is enlightening: this library required special attention and wasn't just about getting rebuilt with a different package name. https://tracker.debian.org/news/1509816/accepted-libaio-03113-6-source-into-unstable/ Guillem is absolutely right regarding avoiding the roundtrip to NEW and d-i's not caring, but some kind of heads-up to debian-boot@ (now cc'd) would have been welcome. It'd be nice if the Debian LVM Team (hello waldi) could pick it up from here and see whether requesting a binNMU is what makes most sense here, or if there other plans on the t64 front. A local, cowbuilder-powered rebuild of unstable's lvm2 results in udebs referencing libaio.so.1t64 as expected (i.e. libaio1t64's shlibs). Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmX8sQgACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSAw/BAAiAR10vIOyN5h7Q7d5+48Z86yMbn/uYsp0nM9S04DWwH+ZJKOfw9lAwPv Cyte5eK4vuFqQb/XB5DQG7XgWbGsRGZPVI4tsEguuGF4JXy+13848lPjFmNHIB6j aILD/n6vZkHvHdpNboqzN3k/pMIGqf6eg7VcNRZLqswsxu9F3QfUVq+q8ldW6IGG yZPPblv1oOMbDD2u4HpDC3gUKc9w7qRoQCCsNRnVCnB6OS09zgZEAVIo7TlH0rd6 xu4kbK+HqhS26LpEcpbgcXSyIIhEq1mRt4n85M7uW3Flg4+q+ue3qa01eFpyiC5f 8McjElqIOSjkqr5bANVwiHlvksEaToA8hcwRy17TQ5YQdNjgYt8mszBY4VPgSlIp IAmIis5eVlO/6dqDFno+PNKfocPqVcoKPYilsv6j4PuR5VfTxJiXy8qoqWhFRU0C YHnXO+4sGbP3O9xVFcS9EsKWS2beNzCCW8ODGSYawuBRBSGp1PoqErM4b4TlVcWp pBDFzN5QOHC/63s5wsOSa0HGL1tz6sqnP/wtXC+FKygdKs4JEHOqB1dw22tBT9hJ 8dy4y2cqPURHR61ERDXWOrLobPdBR8RbBi6srNPPCCE2z5NixvsxJyjV1zDNFSuW Ubsf3j4PZqu/zL46vFzJfLDFX30DBY+JvYVhJqTmowgpnO/Y1x0= =4/9I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----