Re: Progress on t64 transition -> building the installer in sid

Philip Hands <[email protected]> (2024-04-15):
> On the other hand, it's taken over a month so far. Rather than living in
> hope for another month, I thought it might be worth removing this as a
> blocker (I've had to tell a couple of people that they'll need to wait
> before they can do their salsa-CI tests :-/ )

I'm not suggesting living in hope, I'm suggesting to get the ball rolling.

The commit lists #1066070, which was a duplicate (because -ECOFFEE) of
#1066069, which got fixed rather quickly. So what we would need are
rebuilds of the reverse dependencies (which I haven't checked right now
would be sufficient to get them fixed), which one could request on the
release team side.

Regarding #1066071, that needs a fix in the package first. Looking at
tracker, it's not migrating any time soon as far as I can see (due to
regressions on 32-bit arms), and I'm not sure how fixing the udeb would
interfere there. So one could start with an upload.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=eunB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----