Re: Bug#1088605: installation-reports: No installable kernel was found in the defined APT sources

Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd
Organization Debian
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

Daniel Lewart <[email protected]> (2024-11-28):
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> (Please provide enough information to help the Debian
> maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling
> in the sections below.)
> 
> Boot method: CD
> Image version: https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 2024-11-25
> Date: 2024-11-28

> ┌───────────────────┤ [!] Install the base system ├────────────────────┐
> │                                                                      │
> │ No installable kernel was found in the defined APT sources.          │
> │                                                                      │
> │ You may try to continue without a kernel, and manually install your  │
> │ own kernel later. This is only recommended for experts, otherwise    │
> │ you will likely end up with a machine that doesn't boot.             │
> │                                                                      │
> │ Continue without installing a kernel?                                │
> │                                                                      │
> │ <Go Back>                                          <Yes>    <No>     │
> │                                                                      │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> <Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
>       and ideas you had during the initial install.>
> 
> Everything went fine until base-installer failed.
> I think the cause is that this directory:
> 	pool/main/l/linux-signed-amd64
> is missing the following files:
> 	linux-image-x.y.z-amd64_x.y.z-1_amd64.deb
> 	linux-image-amd64_x.y.z-1_amd64.deb
> This should be easy to reproduce.

Looping in debian-cd@, who is responsible for image builds. There are no
linux-image* debs mentioned in list-cd indeed. linux got uploaded on
Saturday, but linux-signed-* only came in on Monday, which is weekly
image build day. Not sure that explains everything though.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected])            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=A+Zb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.