Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4
"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:12 PM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > On 13/01/2025 at 14:28, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > >> > >> AFAIK the only implementation of Petitboot on arm64 (Odroid) supports > >> ext4 so there is no need to rollback to ext2. I did not mean to roll > >> back to ext2 but to create a separate /boot partition only with LVM, as > >> I do not see the benefit of a separate ext4 /boot partition without LVM. > > > > FWIW, I hadn't heard about Petitboot before this bug either, so I looked > > on their Github repo and found "and ARM64 with ACPI" ... and I think the > > "with ACPI" is significant. > > So going back to ext2 on arm64 just for Petitboot users seems a bit > > heavy handed to me (but I may not fully understand it all). > > Do I need to repeat that I did no suggest to revert the /boot partition > to ext2 on arm64 ? I found other evidence that Petitboot supports ext4: Not AFAIC. My post was basically a +1 on yours + some possible extra arguments to support using ext4 on arm64 and not reverting to ext2. And FWIW, I also found 'hints' that ext4 not working was to be considered an anomaly itself.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZ4V25wAKCRDXblvOeH7b bp4OAQDzdFXPwMk8rKFNQlwk0eKvZhfyBbTtoz0f9R19Ux4tlgD9G0CObABKGsJN tlX10DQTcc1JmCCxd31TruaTHHr+0QI= =SR6v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----