Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4

"Diederik de Haas" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:12 PM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> On 13/01/2025 at 14:28, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> > On Mon Jan 13, 2025 at 9:36 AM CET, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> >>
> >> AFAIK the only implementation of Petitboot on arm64 (Odroid) supports
> >> ext4 so there is no need to rollback to ext2. I did not mean to roll
> >> back to ext2 but to create a separate /boot partition only with LVM, as
> >> I do not see the benefit of a separate ext4 /boot partition without LVM.
> > 
> > FWIW, I hadn't heard about Petitboot before this bug either, so I looked
> > on their Github repo and found "and ARM64 with ACPI" ... and I think the
> > "with ACPI" is significant.
> > So going back to ext2 on arm64 just for Petitboot users seems a bit
> > heavy handed to me (but I may not fully understand it all).
>
> Do I need to repeat that I did no suggest to revert the /boot partition 
> to ext2  on arm64 ? I found other evidence that Petitboot supports ext4:

Not AFAIC. My post was basically a +1 on yours + some possible extra
arguments to support using ext4 on arm64 and not reverting to ext2.
And FWIW, I also found 'hints' that ext4 not working was to be
considered an anomaly itself.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQT1sUPBYsyGmi4usy/XblvOeH7bbgUCZ4V25wAKCRDXblvOeH7b
bp4OAQDzdFXPwMk8rKFNQlwk0eKvZhfyBbTtoz0f9R19Ux4tlgD9G0CObABKGsJN
tlX10DQTcc1JmCCxd31TruaTHHr+0QI=
=SR6v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.