Re: ppc64el Trixie Alpha 1 /boot may be ext2 not ext4
Holger Wansing <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot,gmane.linux.debian.devel.cd |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Pascal Hambourg <[email protected]> wrote (Sun, 12 Jan 2025 23:44:27 +0100): > In a perfect world, all boot loaders would support /boot on ext4 and we > would not have to make trade-offs. Indeed we must make a trade-off > between robustness (ext4 vs ext2), convenience (/boot in root filesystem > vs small separate /boot) and compatibility with boot loaders. And I > believe we can do it right at least for use cases we know about. You > addressed the case of guided partitioning without LVM on ppc64el, why without -> with ^^^ > not do the same for guided partitioning without LVM ? Do you think that > the robustness or convenience gain of not having a separate ext2 /boot > partition is worth the loss of compatibility with Petitboot ? Ok, so I have now changed that, to create a separate ext2 /boot partition for the non-lvm case as well. Holger