Bug#1077764: Ruling request on os-release specification implementation
Marc Haber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.ctte |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ZrB5GyxJH7yAPeNv__20645.5710738496$1722841586$gmane$org@torres.zugschlus.de> |
On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 02:07:54AM +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > Yet I cannot (painlessly) distinguish a Debian image that > has been created with debootstrap from one that has been created with > mmdebstrap either, and I'm not losing sleep about it. Still it would actually be nice to have an indication somewhere in /etc indicating what software suite (installer, debootstrap, mmdebstrap, live-installer etc) generated the image. Thanks for that idea! > > If trixie was identified as trixie, and sid was identified as unstable, > > what compromise would be, er, compromised, precisely? > Unstable would become less useful at weeding out bugs in packages before > they reach testing, Can you elaborate on that? Why does providing more and better information make it harder to identify bugs? Greetings Marc